Students’ Challenges in Employing AI Tools in Legal Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.25524Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Artificial Intelligence Tools, Legal English, Legal Writing.Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently provided English learners with various interactive alternatives in classes. However, limited research has been conducted into the use of AI in English for specific purposes (ESP), especially Legal English. This paper investigates challenges students face when incorporating AI tools into Legal English Writing, stemming from either the tools themselves or their compatibility with Legal English. Forty-two undergraduate students of Legal English at the Ho Chi Minh City University of Law completed a structured questionnaire to gather quantitative data on their obstacles. The findings revealed that the primary challenges include overreliance on AI tools, educational ethics regarding plagiarism, and reduced creativity. These thoughtful insights shed light on pedagogical implications, helping guide students to use AI tools responsibly and effectively. The study also contributes to further research on AI in ESP, calling for deeper investigation to improve students’ legal writing and other general purposes.
References
Alkamel, M. A., & Alwagieh, N. A. (2024). Utilizing an adaptable artificial intelligence writing tool (ChatGPT) to enhance academic writing skills among Yemeni university EFL students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101095.
Campoverde-Quezada, D. A.-R. (2024). The Double-Edged Sword: Benefits and Challenges that Artificial Intelligence Tools can Bring to EFL Teaching and Learning. Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas, 7(2), 304-316.
Cummings, R. E., Monroe, S., & Watkins, M. (2024). Generative AI in first-year writing: An early analysis of affordances, limitations, and a framework for the future. Computers and composition, 71(2), 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102827.
Dugosija, T. (2024). Benefits and challenges of artificial intelligence in English language teaching. Knowledge International Journal, 62(2), 275-280. Retrieved from https://ikm.mk/ojs/index.php/kij/article/view/6590.
Ho, P. P. (2024). Using ChatGPT in English Language Learning: A Study on I.T. Students’Attitudes, Habits, and Perceptions. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(1), 55-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24414
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Eduational Research Open, 5, 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296.
McKinsey. (2021). The state of AI in 2021. McKinsey & Company.
Nozima, A. (2023). The Distinguishing Features of Legal Writing in English. International Journal of Formal Education, 2(5), 119-124. Retrieved from https://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/ijfe/article/view/819/707.
Pham, T. M., & Cao, T. T. (2025). The Practice of ChatGPT in English Teaching and Learning in Vietnam: A Systematic Review. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 5(1), 50-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.25513
Shen, X., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Three-wave cross-lagged model on the correlations between critical thinking skills, self-directed learning competency and AI-assisted writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101524.
Shofiah, N., Putera, Z. F., & Solichah, N. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in the use of artificial intelligence in education for academic writing : A scoping review. Conference Psychology and Flourishing Humanity (PFH 2023), 174-193, https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-188-3_20). Atlantis Press.
Stornaiuolo, A., Higgs, J., Jawale, O., & Martin, R. M. (2024). Digital writing with AI platforms: the role of fun with/in generative AI. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 23(1), 83-103, https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2023-0103.
Strickland, C. J. (2012). The Dark Side of Unattributed Copying and the Ethical Implications of Plagiarism in the Legal Profession. North Carolina Law Review, 90(3), 919-956. Retrieved from https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/nclr/vol90/iss3/9/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pham Thi Thuy Dung, Luong Minh Hieu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The copyright of all articles published in the International Journal of TESOL & Education (ijte) remains with the Authors, i.e. Authors retain full ownership of their article. Permitted third-party reuse of the open access articles is defined by the applicable Creative Commons (CC) end-user license which is accepted by the Authors upon submission of their paper. All articles in the ijte are published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, meaning that end users can freely share an article (i.e. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt it (i.e. remix, transform and build upon the material) on the condition that proper attribution is given (i.e. appropriate credit, a link to the applicable license and an indication if any changes were made; all in such a way that does not suggest that the licensor endorses the user or the use) and the material is only used for non-commercial purposes.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository, in a journal or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
